Hoarders... Gotta Love Them!

Last week I got so enthralled with boxes and boxes of photographs that I completely forgot to post an article. In lieu of words, I'm staying with the images. Check out the Callaway Family Archives on Facebook for glimpses of some Callaway ancestors. There are many who remained unknown, so Tuesdays are now designated "Tuesday Tagging." I hope others may know who these ancestors are and comment on them.

Don't forget to like the Callaway Family Archives Facebook page for regular updates.

Tuesday Tagging - A Gentleman's Airs

Picture found in Callaway Collection of Photographs, Unidentified Male

Do you know who this might be?

P00004 - "A Gentleman's Airs"

Albumin print, circa 1860 - 1890

Costume, circa 1860s

Costume is similar to style found printed in Harper's Weekly (February 27, 1864) - notice sleeves and shoulders of jacket; buttons and placement

Please Welcome, Mrs. Logan

If you're interested in literature or genealogy, you may have heard of the name Deborah Norris Logan and everything I say about her is redundant... but there's always the possibility you'll learn something new. However, if you have not met Mrs. Logan, let me introduce you.

Me: Mrs. Logan, what is your opinion of family history?

Mrs. Logan: I have frequently thought that it would be both profitable and pleasant if some person in every family would make it their concern to keep a book in which they would record ancestral traditions. My diaries and commonplace books are the very heirlooms my ancestors denied me. I now use these as a means to preserve fresh in memory passing events... the habit of noting down as they occur  the incidents of the times... or anythings that shall appear worthy of preservation. [Excerpts from Deborah Logan's manuscript diaries located at the historical Society of Pennsylvania]

*Mrs. Logan was the 1st female member of the Historical Society of Pennsylvania and the youngest member of prolific literary club as well as a highly regarded keeper of cultural memory during the early republic of America. She believed in archiving and preservation and careful genealogical research. There are a number of biographies regarding Mrs. Logan and her literary companions; however, I suggest reading something a little different regarding her.

Stabile, Susan M. (2004). Memory’s Daughters: The Material Culture of Remembrance in Eighteenth-Century America. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Rather than expand on the typical biography or discuss the transformative thoughts of archives and genealogy, one will encounter words such as “topophilic” (love of place) and “materialized memory” (14). These are terms Stabile explores throughout the book especially in regards to the writings of 18^th century women such as Deborah Norris Logan, Elizabeth Fergusson, Hannah Griffits, Susanna Wright, and Annis Stockton. Drawing from their commonplace books, manuscripts and poems, Stabile reconstructs the material world these women preserved through their remembrances or memory.

As a result, Stabile maps a remarkable symmetry between the interior homes of the women and their innermost minds – she “interpreted vernacular architecture as palaces of memory” (14) – a type of topophilic materialism. Since the writers experience the world through their senses and often remember through sensational triggers of smells, sights, sounds, touch and taste, their minds are recording their local history, the experiences of their time. This idea is promoted by the 18^th century philosophy of associationism, “Which postulated a direct, physical link connecting domestic architecture, material objects, and memory” (30). This parallel between material form of architecture and the immaterial form of ideas is unified together and communicated when written. The writing is the materialization of memory.  

Stabile states: “The commonplace book, then, is an archive in both senses of the word: as a physical object, it represents rhetorical topoi, or places for memory storage; as a text, it is the very stuff of memory making” (16). It is important to note that Stabile makes it clear that without memory or association, the objects would not be recorded and thus unarchived making them immaterial. Deborah Logan comments on this when discussing the lack of material evidence of her female ancestors. Stabile also addresses this with regards to Susanna Wright who was a Quaker and had a disregard for material possession. As a result, there is little material evidence for Wright. The point being that humans, or women in this case, project meaning onto object through their sentimental associations of memory and materialize their meaning through writing or deposition.

So, are you writing your family's history?

A Family Story

How would you prefer to read your family's story? I don't think people realize how many ways a story can be told. I've taken "Creative Non-Fiction" and "Short Fiction" writing using my family history in workshop. Some of the stories that have come out of it have been well received (though I think my family is too bias). I have two more writing workshops on the horizon, so I'm curious about what my potential audience thinks about family stories.

What genre of writing would you prefer?
* Biographies are detailed accounts of a person's life based strictly on researched facts. 
* Creative Non-Fiction are stories that just stick to the facts and research with a narrative style. It's honest writing with flair, but no fiction or suppositions. 
* Historical Faction or Fiction, based on facts and true events/people; however imagination and suppositions combine to enhance the narrative so it reads more like a story.The story is real with several fictionalized or dramatized elements.
* Slice of Life are stories without a plot and are more like scenes of everyday life. 

What writing format would you prefer?
Children's Story
Short Story
Novella
Novel

You have until 7:30 am (Central), December 27, 2013 to place your votes in the upper right of the blog.

An Apple for Irene

In genealogy searches, I spend significant portions of my research on those darn men. Why? Not because they're more interesting. It's because there's usually more information about them in official records. Occasionally, a rare apple emerges from a barrel of pears and a woman's history ripens.

You've heard me talk about Irene before, the wife of John Hansford Callaway. While trying to answer questions in "Oh, Where Art Thou?" I came to learn more about Irene and her Baker family. Irene was raised by a widowed mother who never remarried. (I followed Amelia Baker all the way to Texas where she died.) Amelia also bought property over the course of several years and established a fairly large estate and farm in Coffee County. The finances from the farm allowed her to turn the day-to-day operations to her two older sons while she and her two daughters and two younger sons lived in Summerfield, Dallas County, Alabama. Amelia seems like a pretty independent and intelligent woman and I wonder how that affected her youngest daughter, Irene. 

The only fact I have is from the 1860 cencus which states that Irene was a teacher in Summerfield, Alabama. Everything else I come up with are suppositions and educated guesses.  I started by trying to learn more about the town of Summerfield. Why would Amelia decide to take her family there in the late 1850s? 

Summerfield, was originally a town named Valley Creek which was just a few miles north of Selma, Alabama (which served as the county seat). Another interesting tidbit is that 30 years prior another nearby town called Cahaba was the county seat and briefly the state capitol. Therefore, this whole area appears to be an urban center of commerce and administration. I soon found out that Summerfield was an area of ministry and education as well. Before Valley Creek was renamed in 1845, the town had charted the county's first academy in 1829. Later in 1841, the Alabama Conference of Methodist Church opened the Methodist Centenary Institute, a co-educational university. 

For a mother like Amelia, this must of seemed like the ideal place to take her daughters. Her oldest daughter Dulcenia married a teacher and her younger one was teacher, maybe at the Centenary Institute. At least, I like to think so. I can't find much information about the town on the web; however, there is a wonderful account of the college is preserved in A History of Methodism in Alabama (1893) which you can download for free.

Oh, Where art thou?

1860 was a turbulent year. People were split on slavery, the cotton market hadn't fully recovered from its 1850 crash, and John Hansford Callaway was nowhere to be found in the official records. His father, Jonathan Hosea Callaway, was in Arkansas but not John Hansford. In a fit of fustration, I decided to search for Irene Baker. This is usually a worst deadend because women were not considered 'valuable' (and I know that's open to debate, but for the sake of simplicity lets just move on). 

Surpisingly, Irene was in the records... just not where I thought she should be according to the family bible (read "Confusion is Good"). Once I found Irene's 1860 census, I then found the marriage license which just goes to show that you have to branch out into different search avenues.

Despite this fist-pumping moment, I was still confronted and confounded by the question, "Why did John go to Dallas County, Alabama to get married?" and "How did they meet?" The previous years records showed him well established in the areas of Dale, Coffee and Geneva County, Alabama. 

How did they meet?

After doing some land records search I found that Amelia Baker, Irene's mother, owned a good parcel of land in Coffee County. She had about 8 tracts of land all right together, two tracts were bought in 1853 and another six in 1858. However, the census shows her in Coffee County as early as 1850 then in Dallas County in 1860. Turns out, Jonathan Hosea Callaway bought some land less than a mile from them in 1858 and we know he was in Coffee County according to the Alabama State Census. Using the information available, here's what I think happened.

1845 - First tracts of land bought in Coffee County by Jonathan Hosea Callaway.
1850 - Both the Baker Family and Callaway Family are in Coffee County, Alabama according to census.
1853 - Amelia Baker buys land in Coffee County. 
1857 - Baker Family has probably moved to Dallas County, Alabama. Irene's sister, Dulcenia, gets married to Joseph Callaway (no relation that I can find at this time). In the 1860 census their daughter is 2 years old, putting their marriage about 1857. Irene would have been old enough to start teaching and her 2 older brothers remained in Coffee Co. on the census. Presumably, they are running the farm.
1858 - The Baker farm expands and Johnathan Hosea Callaway buys land less than a mile away. It was not an uncommon practice to send the oldest son out to get the land started. Therefore, John Hansford would have likely become friends with his neighbors, the Baker boys. It's also possible that John Hansford would have met Irene when her family came home to visit the farm. Courtship through letters was also common during this time. 
1860 - Jonathan Hosea Callaway packs up his family and sets out for Arkansas. Meanwhile, John Hansford travels to Dallas County where his future wife is finishing up teaching her school term. They get married, set off for Arkansas and made a family.

That's what I think happened.

Callaway Family (L-R) : Eli Elisha, John Hansford, William, Irene P., and John Hosea 

Confusion is Good

The 1860 census for Irene Baker did cause some confusion. The census was "enumerated to me on the 29th day of August 1860." Yet, the scanned pages of the Callaway Family Bible state "John Hansford Callaway Marry Irene Baker Jan. 15th. 1860." Why was Irene still with her Baker family in August?

Well, the first thing I wanted to do was see if I could verify the marriage date. A quick search on Family Search (see link on right) clarified another facet: John and Irene were married on July 4, 1860. Not January 15 according to Dallas County court documents. And remember what I said about taking that extra click to view the document. Here it is:

Aside from the date, what does this document tell me? For one, it tells me that they were married in Dallas County where the Baker family was living and where Irene was working as a teacher, possibly at the Centenary Institute. I find it interesting that John went to Irene's home to get married and not the other way around. Why? That's a question I'll pursue next time.

Anyway, to get back to the original question. Why was Irene still recorded as living at home if she was already married by July 4, 1860? And since she was married, why wasn't John recorded in the August 29, 1860 census?

Here's where a little knowledge of American History and Public Administration come in handy. It's that darned red tape. The procedure for the 8th United States Census (the 1860 one) was to inquire as to those individuals who lived in the household as of June 1, 1860. Even if census takers collected information well beyond that date, all information was collected from the June 1, 1860 date. This explains why the August 29, 1860 census records Irene living at home. As of June 1, 1860 she was still living at home. John and Irene married in July 4, 1860 after the school session had ended. So even though Irene was not physically in the home in August, she was counted because she would have been there in June.

Where did John and Irene go? That's a question for another article.